tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4505812700967330296.post1834172761033559051..comments2023-10-30T11:46:43.284+00:00Comments on Musings of the Cosmic Calamari: Second Order ExpandingSpaceSquidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09760939592584995876noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4505812700967330296.post-46550928356802536972011-03-16T01:02:03.822+00:002011-03-16T01:02:03.822+00:00I would agree, actually, with the caveat that in r...I would agree, actually, with the caveat that in returning to $Arkham + i$ there is consideration of the fact that multiple expansions have a disproportionate effect on the difficulty of the game. If there is a bias towards "nice" expansion cards, then I think your suggestion would work very well.SpaceSquidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09760939592584995876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4505812700967330296.post-40175267654140160622011-03-14T13:27:55.929+00:002011-03-14T13:27:55.929+00:00Beefing up the current expansions with cards aimed...Beefing up the current expansions with cards aimed at them seems like a good idea to me. I only have Innsmouth, so I don't kno how things work for every other expansion, but everything card in Innsmouth only affects standard Arkham or Innsmouth. As you add expansions this will unavoidably dilute the stuff related to each expansion. The goal of this expansion should be, in my opinion, for each $i$ that is currently an expansion, restore the proportion of $i$-related cards in the overall deck to something much more similar to just $Arkham + i$ rather than the current $Arkham + \sum_i i$.BigHeadnoreply@blogger.com